Addressing the ethical challenges to informed consent for brain tissue donation

Main Article Content

Amitabha Palmer

Abstract




The tremendous medical promise of human organoids has led large research institutions and national agencies to create brain tissue banks. In response, regulatory agencies have created regulations that guide consent processes for collecting tissue samples from donors. These regulations are, in part, intended to ensure that donors’ samples are not used in ways that conflict with their moral values, beliefs, and goals. While these regulations frequently serve this purpose well, we argue that they are insufficient in the case of brain tissue donation because of unique ethical concerns that arise from technologies and applications that use brain tissue samples. After considering the inadequacies, we suggest how consent policies can be improved. We focus on US policy specifically because some Caribbean and Latin American countries reference US regulatory frameworks in developing their own.




Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

PLUMX Metrics

Article Details

How to Cite
Palmer, A. (2024). Addressing the ethical challenges to informed consent for brain tissue donation. Medicina Y Ética, 35(3), 851–895. https://doi.org/10.36105/mye.2024v35n3.05
Section
Articles

References

Kairiyama E, Martínez Pardo ME, Sánchez Noda E, Otero I. Overview on radiation and tissue banking in Latin America. Cell and Tissue Banking. 2018; 19(2):249–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10561-018-9699-9

Walton P, Pérez-Blanco A, Beed S, Glazier A, Ferreira D, Kingdon J. Organ and Tissue Donation Consent Model and Intent to Donate Registries: Recommendations from an International Consensus Forum. Transplant Direct. 2023; 9(5):e1416–6. https://doi.org/10.1097%2FTXD.0000000000001416

National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine. The Emerging Field of Human Neural Organoids, Transplants, and Chimeras. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press; 2021. https://doi.org/10.17226/26078

Haselager DR, Boers SN, Jongsma KR, Vinkers CH, Broekman ML, Bredenoord AL. Breeding brains? Patients’ and laymen’s perspectives on cerebral organoids. Regenerative Medicine. 2020; 15(12):2351–60. https://doi.org/10.2217/rme-2020-0108

de Jongh D, Massey EK, Berishvili E, Fonseca LM, Lebreton F, Bellofatto K. Organoids: a systematic review of ethical issues. Stem Cell Research & Therapy. 2022; 13(1). Available at: https://stemcellres.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13287-022-02950-9

Molina CP. Regulation of Tissue Engineered Devices in some Latin American Countries: Development and External Influences*. Universitas Odontológica [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2023 Aug 7]; 37(79). Available at: https://www.redalyc.org/journal/2312/231267124003/html/

Founta KM, Papanayotou C. In Vivo Generation of Organs by Blastocyst Complementation: Advances and Challenges. International Journal of Stem Cells. 2021; 15(2). https://doi.org/10.15283/ijsc21122

Drost J, Clevers H. Organoids in cancer research. Nature Reviews Cancer [Internet]. 2018; 18(7):407–18. Available from: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41568-018-0007-6

Hyun I, Scharf-Deering JC, Lunshof JE. Ethical issues related to brain organoid research. Brain Research. 2020; 1732:146653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2020.146653

De Vries RG, Tomlinson T, Kim HM, Krenz C, Haggerty D, Ryan KA. Understanding the Public’s Reservations about Broad Consent and Study-By-Study Consent for Donations to a Biobank: Results of a National Survey. Sapino A, editor. PLOS ONE. 2016; 11(7):e0159113. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159113

Bollinger J, May E, Mathews D, Donowitz M, Sugarman J. Patients’ perspectives on the derivation and use of organoids. Stem Cell Reports. 2021; 16(8):1874–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stemcr.2021.07.004

Chen HI, Wolf JA, Blue R, Song MM, Moreno JD, Ming G. Transplantation of Human Brain Organoids: Revisiting the Science and Ethics of Brain Chimeras. Cell Stem Cell. 2019; 25(4):462–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2019.09.002

National Association for Biomedical Research. Oversight: NABR.ORG [Internet]. www.nabr.org. 2020 [cited 2023 Mar 17]. Available at: https://www.nabr.org/biomedical-research/oversight

Lensink MA, Boers SN, Jongsma KR, Carter SE, van der Ent CK, Bredenoord AL. Organoids for personalized treatment of Cystic Fibrosis: Professional perspectives on the ethics and governance of organoid biobanking. Journal of Cystic Fibrosis. 2021; 20(3):443–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcf.2020.11.015

Domaradzki J, Pawlikowski J. Public Attitudes toward Biobanking of Human Biological Material for Research Purposes: A Literature Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2020 Nov 16]; 16(12). Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6617000/#B44-ijerph-16-02209

Wendler D. Broad versus Blanket Consent for Research with Human Biological Samples. Hastings Center Report. 2013; 43(5):3–4. https://doi.org/10.1002/hast.200

Beskow LM. Lessons from HeLa Cells: The Ethics and Policy of Biospecimens. Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics. 2016; 17(1):395–417. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-genom-083115-022536