Experience of dialogue between adults and young university students on gender issues
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The generational difference affects the student-university teacher relationship and has consequences on learning. To promote openness to dialogue among these groups on conflicting issues, a series of workshops were developed for a gender dialogue experience. The approach was multidisciplinary, including elements of philosophy, sociology, communication, and bioethics. The theoretical lines of approach were Engelhardt’s “moral strangers”, a parallel with intercultural dialogue, and communication at the level of the values at stake. This article reports the methodology of the two-day workshops held at a university in Mexico. The participants were 50 young people (between 18 and 25 years) and 50 adults. Four workshops and two surveys were conducted, interspersed by three conferences. The article presents each activity with the corresponding learning objective and results. In conclusion,some lessons on intergenerational dialogue and on gender dialogue are offered.
Downloads
PLUMX Metrics
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Medicina y Ética is distributed under a Creative Commons License Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional.
The author keeps the property rights with no restriction whatsoever and guarantees the magazine the right to be the first publication of the work. The author is free to deposit the published version in any other medium, such as an institutional archive or on his own website.
References
Engelhardt HT. The Foundations of Bioethics. New York: Oxford University Press; 1996. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195057362.001.0001
Harteveld E, Berntzen L, Kokkonen A, Kelsall H, Linde J, Dahlberg S. The (Alleged) Consequences of Affective Polarization: Individual-Level Evidence & a Survey Experiment in 9 Countries [Internet]. 2022 [citado 28 de diciembre 2022]. Disponibile en: https://osf.io/64uwd/ DOI: https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/64uwd
Jost J, Baldassarri D, Druckman J. Cognitive-motivational mechanisms of political polarization in social-communicative contexts. Nat Rev Psychol [Internet]. 2022 [citado 28 de diciembre de 2022]; Disponibile en: https://www.nature.com/articles/s44159-022-00093-5
Nordbrandt M. Affective polarization in the digital age: testing the direction of the relationship between social media and users’ feelings for out-group parties. NewMedia & Society [Internet]. 2021 [citado 28 de diciembre de 2022]. Disponibile en: https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211044393 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211044393
Jones-Jang S, Chung M. Can we blame social media for polarization? Counter-evidence against filter bubble claims during the COVID-19 pandemic. New Media & Society [Internet]. 2022 [citado 28 de diciembre de 2022]. Disponibile en: https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221099591 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221099591
Austriaco NPG. Biomedicine and Beatitude: An Introduction to Catholic Bioethics. 2a ed. Washington, D.C.: The Catholic University of America Press; 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1tfw0p2
Deardorff D. Manual for developing intercultural competencies: story circles [Internet]. Paris: UNESCO Publishing; 2020 [citado 22 de abril de 2023]. Disponibile en: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000370336
Fletcher S. Intergenerational Dialogue to Reduce Prejudice. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships [Internet]. 2007 [citado 22 de abril de 2023]; Disponibile en: https://doi.org/10.1300/J194v05n01_02 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1300/J194v05n01_02
UNESCO. UNESCO survey on intercultural dialogue, 2017: analysis of findings [Internet]. Paris: UNESCO Publishing; 2018 [citado 22 de abril de 2023]. Disponibile en: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000262674
Rodríguez M. Teoría de género: presupuestos y raíces filosóficas. Rome: G&B Press; 2022. http://127.0.0.1:80/pug/resource?uri=453943BIB