Institutional development of bioethics in Ibero-America: preliminary results of the Ibero-American Bioethics Atlas
Main Article Content
Abstract
This paper presents the preliminary results obtained in the conformation of the Ibero-American Atlas on Bioethics developed by the Anahuac Center for Strategic Development in Bioethics (CADEBI) regarding the identification and analysis of the existing Bioethics institutions in the Region. A documentary review was carried out through search engines, databases, social networks, and other sources. The information obtained was grouped into six different categories according to the structure, objectives, and activities developed. In this way, an initial diagnosis was made based on the documentary sources available on the Web. As part of the results, 157 institutions in 25 countries were identified, as well as the variation in institutional density, concentrated mainly in Spain (29 institutions), Mexico (26 institutions), Argentina (17 institutions), Brazil (13 institutions), Chile (11 institutions), and Colombia (8 institutions). It also highlights the importance of national bioethics commissions in institutional development, pointing out the relationship between the scientific and technological progress of countries and the development of bioethics. The text concludes with a proposal to create an Observatory of the Ibero-American Bioethics Network to document and promote institutional and scientific exchange in the Region, as well as some recommendations derived from the development of this work.
Downloads
PLUMX Metrics
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Medicina y Ética is distributed under a Creative Commons License Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional.
The author keeps the property rights with no restriction whatsoever and guarantees the magazine the right to be the first publication of the work. The author is free to deposit the published version in any other medium, such as an institutional archive or on his own website.
References
Casillas GE. Por una historia de la Bioética. Rev Méd Electrón. 2017; 39(5):1171-1179. http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.phpscript=sci_arttext&pid=S1684-18242017000500018&lng=es&tlng=es
Cardona C., El desarrollo de la bioética en Latinoamérica y el aporte desde el franciscanismo. El ágora [Internet]. 2010; 10(1):243-268. https://revistas.usb.edu. co/index.php/Agora/article/view/369
Secretaría de Salud. El secretario de salud develó el busto del dr. Manuel Velasco Suárez. Comunicado de prensa, núm. 087, 2002.
Guerra-Harriette D. Bioethical Education: a need for training educators. EduSol. 2016; 16 (57):75-86. https://www.redalyc.org/journal/4757/475753137022/html/
Schneegans S, Lewis J, Straza T. Resumen del informe de la UNESCO sobre la ciencia: la carrera contra el reloj para un desarrollo más inteligente; resumen ejecutivo. Francia: UNESCO; 2021.
Banco Mundial. Gasto en investigación y desarrollo (% del PIB) 1996-2021; 2024. Disponible en: https://datos.bancomundial.org/indicator/GB.XPD.RSDV.GD
Ops, Oms. Agenda de Salud Sostenible para las Américas 2018-2030; 2018.
CYTED. Programa Iberoamericano de Ciencia y Tecnología para el Desarrollo [Internet]. Ruralbit; 2024 [citado 30 de enero de 2024]. Disponible en: https://www.cyted.org/conteudo.php?idm=208
Saada A. Introducción. Estatuto epistemológico de la bioética; 2005.
Lolas F. Bioética: interdisciplinariedad, interculturalidad, interdiscursividad. Acta Bioeth. 2017; 23(2):211-2. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S1726-569X2017000200211