Power, legitimacy and urgency of social responsibility of organizations through advertising for sustainable development

Main Article Content

Raúl Santos Morales, Dr.
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6128-9616

Abstract

The social responsibility of organizations has always been questioned as it is seen mainly as a strategic advantage or as a competitive advantage and is rarely seen as an authentic commitment to improve the ecological, social and economic conditions of certain communities or of the planet itself. Using the theory of stakeholder identification and salience of interest groups, a content analysis was carried out on the power, legitimacy, urgency and social responsibility approach of the advertising campaigns of organizations as opposed as Coca-Cola and Greenpeace, finding in general that all of them have a focus on social responsibility as a competitive advantage and as an authentic organizational commitment, although one of them seems to be engaging in a strategic advantage approach, but in particular, there is little urgency in the projects of a civil organization like Greenpeace, unlike a mega corporation like Coca-Cola that knows how to adapt to the urgent problems of each locality. A broader analysis can show how legitimacy, urgency, power and social responsibility are manifested through advertising for sustainable development of other types of organizations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

PLUMX Metrics

Article Details

How to Cite
Santos Morales, R. (2021). Power, legitimacy and urgency of social responsibility of organizations through advertising for sustainable development. Sintaxis, 96–110. https://doi.org/10.36105/stx.2021edesp50aniv.06
Section
Artículos
Author Biography

Raúl Santos Morales, Dr., Universidad Anáhuac México

Licenciado en Publicidad y Maestro en Diseño Gráfico. Doctor en Comunicación Aplicada por la Universidad
Anáhuac México. De 1997 a 2006 trabajó en diversas agencias de publicidad para más de 2 000 marcas nacionales y transnacionales. Actualmente es profesor investigador del Centro de Investigación para la Comunicación Aplicada (CICA) de la Facultad de Comunicación de la Universidad Anáhuac México.

References

Ansoff, I. (1965). Corporate strategy. McGraw-Hill.
Ascential Events. (2021). Sustainable development goals lions. Cannes Lions. https://bit.ly/3wOy729
Bridger, J. C., y Lullof, A. E. (2001). Building the sustainable community: is social capital the answer? Sociological Inquiry, 71(4), 458-472. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682X.2001.tb01127.x
The Coca-Cola Company. (2019). Careers. Who we are. Coca-Cola Company. https://bit.ly/3dak4fy
Dale, A., y Newman, L. (2010). Social capital: a necessary and sufficient condition for sustainable community development? Community Development Journal, 45(I), 5-21. https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/bsn028
DDB Budapest. (2019, 12 de junio). Waves of plastic. Case of study. Vimeo. https://bit.ly/3zTmqZW
Enghel, F., y Wilkins, K. G. (eds.) (2012). Communication, media and development: problems and perspectives.
Nordicom.
Enghel, F. (2015). Towards a political economy of communication in development? Nordicom Review, 36, 11-24. https://doi.org/10.1515/nor-2015-0026
Ferron, B., y Guevera, E. (2017). Sociología política de la “comunicación para el cambio social”: pistas para un cambio de enfoque. Commons, 6(1), 45-62. https://bit.ly/3dd438K
Freeman, R. E., y Reed, D. L. (1983). Stockholders and stakeholders: a new perspective on corporate governance. California Management Review, 25(3), 88-106. https://doi.org/10.2307/41165018
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: a stakeholder approach. Pitman.
Garriga, E., y Melé, D. (2004). Corporate social responsibility theories: mapping the territory.
Journal of Business Ethics, 53, 51-71. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BUSI.0000039399.90587.34
Geometry. (2019). It’s time to eat together (Geometry Mexico). YouTube. https://bit.ly/3d6ZQDd
Green, R. (2017, 15 de septiembre). Ascential and Cannes Lions to advance the sustainable development goals agenda. Cannes Lions. https://bit.ly/3vSM6mj
Greenpeace. (2019). Our offices. Greenpeace. https://bit.ly/35OsJ3d
Grootaert, C., y van Bastelaer, T. (2001). Understanding and measuring social capital: a multidisciplinary tool for practitioners. World Bank Publications.
GR Times. (2019, 6 de marzo). Zero waste lab video. YouTube. https://bit.ly/3w2XdJD
Jones, D. (2012). Who cares wins. Why good business is better business. Pearson.
King, P. W. (2009). Climbing Maslow’s pyramid. Choosing your own path through life. Matador.
Latinos en Cannes (2019, 31 de mayo). DDB México presenta “Greenpeace Endangered Passwords”. YouTube. https://bit.ly/3qnGjnv
Maslow, A. H. (1970). Motivation and personality. Harper and Row.
Mayring, P. (2000a). Qualitative inhaltsanalyse. Grundlagen und techniken. 7th ed. Deutscher Studien Verlag.
Mayring, P. (2000b). Qualitative content analysis. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 1(2), 1-7.
https://bit.ly/3xMrNZ2
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., y Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis. A methods sourcebook. 3er ed. Sage.
Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., y Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853-886. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1997.9711022105
Naciones Unidas. (2021). Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible. Naciones Unidas. https://bit.ly/3gYrbdv
Schwab, K. (ed.) (2018). The global competitiveness report 2018. World Economic Forum. https://bit.ly/3y34HxF
United Nations. (1987). Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future (A/42/427). https://bit.ly/3h0Zz6a
Wilkins, K. G. y Enghel. F. (2013). The privatization of development through global communication industries: living proof? Media, Culture & Society, 35(2), 165-181.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443712468606