Análisis del impacto de las controversias por factores ASG en la valuación de acciones en el mercado mexicano

Barra lateral del artículo

The Anáhuac Journal
PDF (English) XML (English)
Publicado: Jun 26, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36105/theanahuacjour.2024v24n1.02
Palabras clave:
inversiones, ASG, controversias, ambiental, social, gobierno corporativo

Contenido principal del artículo

Martha Angélica León Alvarado
EGADE Business School, Tecnológico de Monterrey, México
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5632-4512
Eric Osio Cerón
Grenoble École de Management, Francia
https://orcid.org/0009-0001-3218-0347
Anahi Montserrat Revilla Antonio
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), México
https://orcid.org/0009-0007-1416-4718

Resumen

Existe una amplia literatura sobre las motivaciones que llevan a diversos inversionistas a integrar factores ambientales, sociales y de gobierno corporativo (ASG) en sus estrategias; sin embargo, los estudios sobre esta temática se centran en los mercados desarrollados y no detallan con evidencia si estos factores, a través de las potenciales controversias que generan en su ausencia, tienen efectos significativos en la valoración de instrumentos financieros, por ej., acciones o bonos emitidos por empresas. Por esta razón, el presente estudio analiza y demuestra con evidencia estadística que las controversias asociadas a factores ASG y relacionadas con las acciones en el mercado mexicano aún no se encuentran integradas en las valuaciones correspondientes.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

PLUMX Metrics

Detalles del artículo

Cómo citar
León Alvarado, M. A., Osio Cerón, E., & Revilla Antonio, A. M. (2024). Análisis del impacto de las controversias por factores ASG en la valuación de acciones en el mercado mexicano. The Anáhuac Journal, 24(1), Págs. 38–63. https://doi.org/10.36105/theanahuacjour.2024v24n1.02
Número
Vol. 24 Núm. 1 (2024): The Anáhuac Journal, Vol. 24, núm. 1, 2024, Primer Semestre
Sección
Artículos
Creative Commons License

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.

The Anáhuac Journal se distribuye bajo Licencia Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional.

 

Biografía del autor/a

Martha Angélica León Alvarado, EGADE Business School, Tecnológico de Monterrey, México

Martha León has a PhD in Financial Sciences from Tecnológico de Monterrey, a Fintech certification from the University of Chicago, as well as a specialty in applied statistics at the Instituto de  Investigación en Matemáticas Aplicadas y en Sistemas (IIMAS) from the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM). She also has a background in actuarial science at the UNAM. León is the current Financial Vice-president at the National Commission of the Retirement Savings System (CONSAR). She has 18 years of professional experience, focusing on financial institutions in the public sector. In the private sector, she has experience in finance institutions, insurance, financial risk management, and business intelligence. She is a professor at the EGADE Business School of the Tecnológico de Monterrey.

Eric Osio Cerón, Grenoble École de Management, Francia

Eric Osio serves as General Director of Risk Management at the National Commission of the Retirement Savings System (CONSAR), where he has actively participated, among many other projects and topics, in the migration of the Retirement Savings System to Target Date Funds to improve how pension resources are managed, as well as in the integration of ESG criteria within the regulations applicable to the investment and risk processes of the Retirement Fund Administrators (AFORES). Previously, Eric was part of the team responsible for providing attention to the investment and risk teams within the Mexican Association of Retirement Fund Administrators (AMAFORE), and before that, the Suspicious Activities Investigation team for the prevention of money laundering and financing of terrorism at HSBC. Eric is an Actuary from Anahuac University, has a master’s degree in finance from Grenoble École de Management in France, and has the CESGA certification issued by the European Federation of Financial Analysts Societies (EFFAS).

Anahi Montserrat Revilla Antonio, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), México

Anahi Revilla has a Bachelor’s degree in Economics from the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM) and currently serves as supervisor of the Retirement Savings System (SAR) in the General Directorate of Risk Management at the National Commission of the Retirement Savings System (CONSAR), where she is involved in monitoring and performing analysis on risk management related to the investment regime of the AFORES as well as the development of regulation and integration of ESG criteria. Anahi is involved in various courses in different financial areas and has language skills in English, French, and basic Korean.

Citas

Albuquerque, R., Koskinen, Y., Yang, S., & Zhang, C. (2020). Resiliency of environmental and social stocks: An analysis of the exogenous COVID-19 market crash. Review of Corporate Finance Studies, 9(3), 593–621. https://doi.org/10.1093/rcfs/cfaa011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/rcfs/cfaa011

Baker, M., Bergstresser, D., Serafeim, G., & Wurgler, J. (2022). The pricing and ownership of US green bonds. Annual Review of Finance Economics, 14, 415–437. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-financial-111620-014802 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-financial-111620-014802

Barber, B., Morse, A., & Yasuda, A. (2021). Impact investing. Journal of Finance Economics, 139(1), 162–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2020.07.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2020.07.008

Bauer, R., Ruof, T., & Smeets, P. (2021). Get real! Singles prefer more sustainable investments. Review of Financial Studies, 34(8), 3976–4043. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhab037 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhab037

Bloomberg L.P. (n.d.). [Mexican public equity daily prices, and ESG controversies 2013Q1–2024Q1 in MXN] [Data set]. Retrieved February 15, 2024, from SFU Bloomberg terminal.

Ceccarelli, M., Ramelli, S., & Wagner, A. (2023) [Forthcoming]. Low-carbon mutual funds. Review of Finance. [Finance Working Paper N° 659/2020]. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3353239 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3353239

Cornell, B., & Damodaran, A. (2020). Valuing ESG: Doing Good or Sounding Good? NY Stern School of Business. [SSRN Working Paper #3557432]. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3557432 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3557432

Department of Statistics and Data Science. (n.d.). Comparison of two means. Yale University. http://www.stat.yale.edu/Courses/1997-98/101/meancomp.htm

Fama, E., & French, K. (2007). Disagreement, tastes, and assets prices. Journal of Finance Economics, 83(3), 667–689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2006.01.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2006.01.003

Hartzmark, S., & Sussmann, A. (2019). Do investors value sustainability? A natural experiment examining ranking and fund flows. Journal of Finance, 74(6), 2789–2837. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12841 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12841

Heeb, F., Kölbel, J., Paetzold, F., & Zeisberger, S. (2023). Do investors care about impact? Review of Finance Studies, 36(5), 1737–1787. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhac066 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhac066

Heinkel, R., Kraus, A., & Zechner, J. (2001). The effect of green investment on corporate behavior. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 36(4), 431–449. https://doi.org/10.2307/2676219 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2676219

International Monetary Fund (IMF). (2024). World Economic Outlook Update, January 2024: Moderating inflation and steady growth open path to soft landing. https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WEO/Issues/2024/01/30/world-economicoutlook-update-january-2024

Krueger, P., Sautner, Z., & Starks, L. (2020). The importance of climate risks for institutional investors. Review of Finance Studies, 33(3), 1067–1111. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhz137 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhz137

Morningstar Inc. (n.d.). [Mexican public equity funds, ESG controversies through workspace 2013Q1–2024Q1 in MXN] [Data set]. Retrieved February 15, 2018, from Morningstar Direct.

World Economic Forum (WEF). (2024). The Global Risks Report 2024. Insight report (19th ed.). https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_The_Global_Risks_Report_2024.pdf